A federal judge with a record of substantial Democratic campaign contributions has moved to halt the Trump administration’s plan to reassess government funding. Judge John J. McConnell Jr., appointed by Barack Obama, ruled that the administration must release billions in frozen federal funds, preventing further delays in spending.
McConnell’s decision reinforces a temporary restraining order (TRO) he issued in January, blocking a federal directive that paused disbursements while officials reviewed spending priorities. The administration defended the hold, arguing that the review was necessary to ensure taxpayer money was being used efficiently. However, McConnell ruled that the administration’s actions violated congressional authority over federal allocations.
Before his appointment, McConnell was a frequent donor to Democratic politicians and committees, giving hundreds of thousands of dollars to figures such as Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and Hillary Clinton. His donations also supported Democratic PACs and congressional candidates, raising concerns about whether his political ties influence his judicial decisions.
His involvement in left-leaning legal efforts has also drawn attention. In 2022, McConnell organized a conference that promoted critical race theory discussions, featuring scholars who examined how historical systems of power shaped the legal system. The event, described as focusing on systemic advantages, became a point of controversy among conservatives.
The ruling has sparked a legal battle, with the Trump administration planning to appeal. Meanwhile, Democratic attorneys general from 22 states and Washington, D.C., argue that the ruling should be enforced immediately, pushing for full restoration of the withheld funds. The funds in question include spending tied to Biden-era policies, such as the Inflation Reduction Act.
McConnell’s past political contributions continue to raise concerns among critics. His support for key Democratic lawmakers, including Sens. Jack Reed (D-RI) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), has added to speculation over whether his rulings are politically motivated rather than based on legal merit.
